Civilization

It is a part of human nature to look for ways to get as much benefit as possible with the least amount of effort. This a good trait that motivates us to improve our quality of life. The trouble is that many use this as an excuse to plunder others. Rather than going through the trouble of learning, self discipline and innovation, it is easier to take what belongs to another. People have been struggling for centuries to find a way to form societies where those who are willing to pass through the fire can keep what they have earned and those who are unwilling can at least have their daily needs met. This is no easy task.

With primitive tribal systems, nature is the taskmaster. The tribe will starve if people aren’t willing to hunt and gather. Some tribes became warrior nations so they could easily plunder others if they were lacking anything. Most were nomadic so they could move on to better areas if nature wasn’t cooperating by supplying their needs. This required large areas, had little incentive for improvement and wrecked havoc on the surrounding civil societies. In Europe, there were Vikings, Mongols and others that hadn’t formed civil societies and were known for plundering others.

In a civil society, the goal is to allow people to use their talents and passions without having others pilfer what they have accomplished. The protections come about once the people have taken control. They assemble and agree upon laws. In order to have protection for private ownership and to have a say in governing, requirements have to be in place for citizenship. This is so violent or non-violent nomadic people who should be using their own resources to succeed, cannot come in and pilfer what the citizens have accomplished through their common sacrifices. There are always citizens who are down in their luck and may have lost everything. Most civil societies have programs in place to help them. Those interested in plunder will always characterize themselves as such. That is why nations have legal processes in place to make sure those who come in are non-violent and are not coming in for a life of plunder but one of productivity.

Much of what is going on today concerning immigration is more of a money making scheme by smugglers who act like travel agents. They make millions by convincing others they need to relocate. These same people make promises that the destination nations cannot keep. Yet the travelers are taught from their youth to resent the nations they are convinced to relocate to. The proper way to improve their lot is to stand up for themselves and ask for help from others. Unfortunately it is popular to call civil nations that try to help those who want become civil, colonialists. This rhetoric is used by those who benefit from these oppressive societies. But if a people find it difficult to establish a civil society, there is nothing wrong with asking assistance from the countries they want to copy. Everyone benefits when they stay put and become successful in the areas they are established.

Emulate or Confiscate

Every person wants to live a good life with a certain degree of success in the areas they are passionate about. Self interest isn’t a diabolical motive. Rather than frustrating ourselves trying to navigate through politics, lets take time to look at common principles that we all can agree on. The best way to pursue happiness is through hard work and exhibiting good character. When a people of good character see others succeed, they will want to emulate what these successful people are doing with the hope of having the same degree of success. A good society will consist of people who are good at making voluntary deals with each other so all those involved can improve their lives. This is what it means to be just.

We naturally want to expedite the process of acquiring wealth and success. This is where things can go wrong. There are those who make a good living off inspiring others. They do it by pointing to the known principle of emulating good behaviors. This is the good side of helping others. But there is a diabolical side to inspiration, a shortcut side. It is based in envy and confiscation rather than good character and hard work. The leaders of these movements develop envy and entitlement in their followers rather than admiration and incentive. First they divide people into classes such as unbelievers and true believers, rich and the poor or black and white. After this, resentments are stoked through exaggerating the faults of the opposing classes. Finally, conclusions are drawn that others don’t deserve what they have and something must be done to confiscate it. This mindset forms the basis for every war.

The good news is that it doesn’t take political, community or religious leaders to cause us to work hard, exhibit good character and to have a degree of satisfaction in our lives. It is a personal choice. Every person is capable of making improvements within their own realm of influence with the time they possess. While the merchants of discord do their best to form resentments, those who have good character are enjoying their lives by emulating successful practices and being a good example to others.

According to the Universe

There are two kinds of truth; those that are according to universal truths and those that are true to beliefs. Universal truths are those that we all observe and can agree on. Murdering innocents is wrong as is lying, stealing, hate and bigotry. These have positive principles they support such as the sanctity of life, the pride of accomplishment and understanding others. The list can go on, along with the particulars for each. For instance, we might lie about a surprise party and consider it a white lie. But we can all agree in general on things that are good and bad.

Truths according to beliefs would be those that belong to an association. A politician’s view on lies or corruption would be more liberal than a common person. They become white to them when it pertains to getting into office or they might justify it by thinking the things they do are good for everybody. Religions have their beliefs too. Every sane person is rightly enraged when something violates a universal truth such as beheading an innocent person. But some religions and political movements in the past have considered it a necessary thing. We should be intolerant of associative beliefs that violate universal truth. But associative beliefs that follow universal truths should be acceptable to everyone.

When we talk about having understanding, it pertains to having the ability to sort these things out. Religions and political movements will all have aspects of universal truths mixed in with their beliefs. The universal truths are the attraction and then the others are added. Those who don’t understand this will be judgmental and argue with others about things that pertain to their beliefs. Most conflicts result from lacking the ability to recognize universal truth while championing associative truth.

There can be symbols that pertain to the universal truths in a religion. A cross can be a universal symbol to everyone of altruism; giving ones life for another. The ten commandments are a symbol of a community coming together with an understanding of universal truths. Of course the first commandment puts the name “God” as the universal originator, but we can all agree, although dated and lacking particulars, the commandments represent good sound principles.

Secularism isn’t a bad thing but is simply a declaration that the principles will be universal even if they came from a religion, political view or a philosophy. Our laws should reflect and be based in universal principles. This is where a nation comes together. Once understood, we can read things that may not reflect our beliefs but have good sound principles. We aren’t offended by symbols or things that people say since we are well grounded in what is right. We can savor the good things in other points of views and throw away the associative nonsense.  It makes reading, being a citizen and life in general more enjoyable when these things are sorted out and put in perspective.