Hometown

As we visit our hometown, so much has changed 
Farmers and factories have all moved away 
The classics are rusted, most of them gone
The road that we cruised doesn’t seem very long 
The mayor of this town was once a friend’s child 
A short time ago, cops labeled him wild
The kid down the street has kids of her own
The rich part of town is now simple old homes
The bridge we once dove from is just a guard rail
Few can remember our too many fails
Though we see lots of things that time took away 
There are still many things left to do and to say

We can walk through the park past the old mill
And stroll through the field, hold hands on the hill
Watch the sunset together, there’s still a good view 
Time cannot change how I feel about you 
 

Making it Last

As we age and gain experience, we have a drive to give that knowledge to future generations so they don’t have to learn things the hard way as we did. This drive is what philosophers have toward future generations. The Greeks preserved their observations about life and built on each others conclusions. I have been giving a loose review of Aristotle’s Politics. It is interesting how people throughout history faced the challenges as we do and they experimented with different methods to deal with them. The results can be observed and we can learn from them.

A person given to vice will sacrifice the greater good for momentary pleasures. This makes for short lived pleasure and dependencies. To bring out the best in anything, we address two areas; preservation and actuation. We want to preserve good things for the longest time possible while encouraging the use of each person’s individual passions. The joy of revealing what is in a person’s heart and mind requires a secure environment since there are always those who take advantage or are unjust. A way we try to guarantee this is through contracts. Marriage is a contract to preserve the good between two people and to provide an environment for both people to bring out their best efforts and ideas and to bring up children who perpetuate them. A country is similar to a family. A constitution is the contract between good people to provide a secure environment and give its citizens an environment to express themselves and build what is in their hearts.

In ethics, the goal is lasting happiness. The use of a person’s passions are good unless they jeopardize the ability to have a good life. At that point they become vises. In politics, the goal is to have a lasting republic where people can enjoy freedom and security. These make the best foundation for happiness. We all have causes and personalities that we like. When they become more important than freedom and security for everyone, they become tyranny. In the same way that passions aren’t bad in themselves, our causes are usually good. Personalities we like can be virtuous initially. But if what they do jeopardizes freedom and security, an erosion occurs and the result is a net loss. The goodness can last as long as the personality or interest in the cause is there, but the country falls apart afterward. This is similar to when passions wane and one ends up with their life in a mess.

Concerning the style of governing, a democracy works best when people are all similar such as a farming community. When a city engages in commerce or goes to war, there is a need for skill in governing. That is where a aristocracy works better. Both a monarchy and aristocracy are forms of leadership where we look for the best and brightest. These are stabilized inside the framework of a constitution where the people have defined their responsibilities and limited the scope of their involvement in the affairs of the country.

When Foundations Shake

When you think of me in that quiet place 
Always remember 
This wry smile looking in admiration
Let  thoughts of me put a smile on your face 

I am right here cheering you on 
In everything you do 
As you use that wonderful zeal
That gives us our common bond

Although it is hard to understand 
When foundations shake
One thing holds true through uncertainty 
I will always be your greatest fan 
 

The Source

It’s easy to see with poems and songs
Expressions of love for someone we long
But if we look a bit closer at all that is done 
Everything comes from love. 
A blue collar worker enduring the cold
White collars watch while money unfolds 
From sticks to a house with a builders care
For every goal a lover is there
This old world is a incubator 
It exists to satisfy love
Every nation is built and refined 
With a lover in the back of each mind 
A captive will dream about someone
The only way to be free is to love 

Perfect

What does it mean to be the apple of my eye?

Must have been the feeling of an apple loving guy 
Maybe you should be the beating of my heart!
It skips a beat or two whenever we’re apart 
Whatever name we give it, that missing part of me 
Is the perfect place you are meant to be. 

Patchwork

We are made of a patchwork of passions and pride 

Exchanging our dreams then keep them inside 
Words dance with our feelings whenever we meet 
Captured in hearts where they follow the beat
If love could be seen as it danced through the air
It would find the right heart, the person who cared
Take a bow and a wave before making its home
Then rest in that heart so its never alone

 

It is Only Natural

Lets look at the relationship between philosophy, religion and science. It is best to clear the semantics first since the meanings of words can become blurred in the process of winning arguments. Science is a collection of conclusions based on the scientific method. The scientific method is the process of using strict criteria for experiments to get repeatable results with tangible things. Philosophy is the study of hows and whys, or the intangible things; this would include questions of existence, why things are and where they should be heading. Religion is the branch of philosophy that deals with questions about a higher power or the driving force behind it all.

Philosophy supersedes science. The scientific method is one philosophical approach to studying objects and theories. Philosophy is also the way we determine the use of scientific facts and theories that we discover. For instance, Hitler felt his desire to clear the human gene pool of Slavic and Jewish genes was scientific. We don’t throw out genetic science because his philosophical application was diabolical. It is a little know fact that many tried to do so after the war. Our philosophies determine the use of science in the same way our philosophies influences how we drive a vehicle. The mechanics always stay the same but using it wrong can have damaging effects. It is common today, as in those times, to try and equate one’s philosophy with science in order to appear credible.

A person’s philosophy can lean toward naturalism with the goal of harmony in the earth’s ecosystems. It can have a negative view of man and want to use science to minimize his effect on the earth. One humanistic approach could put man in the forefront as the earth’s steward. Another might go further and say the earth exists to give happiness to mankind and should only be preserved for that means. Each philosophy has an extreme application and can become detrimental to mankind and unjust. Each one will claim to have a solid scientific basis.

Religion comes out of one’s philosophies about authority and a higher power. We see this throughout history. Even if someone considers the higher power a loving creator of everything, they may or may not value other humans more. A humanist may have destructive philosophies as well as we said earlier. This is an area of broad applications because it can be used wrongly in the same way as science can be used for diabolical means. A person can have a strong faith in God yet be a good scientist. In the same way an Atheist can be a good scientist. It is how they apply the science for the good of man that is important. An organized religion will have a mixture of good and bad philosophies. As we mature, we learn to sort them out. A person who wants to discredit another philosophy will always showcase the worst cases. An Atheist will point to religious wars while a Deist will point to communist deaths and the French Revolution as examples of godlessness. But in the end, they will all have certain philosophies, good and bad and will claim to hold the only true science and true belief in the existence or absence of a higher power.

Everyone has a sense of justice within themselves. The fact that everyone shares the desire for equality and respect hints toward the existence of some kind of common spirit that we all share. This is called natural law and it can be corrupted by circumstance and abuses. When we say someone has lost his way, that is what we are referring to. We use this natural sense when confronting religious dogma and off base philosophies. That is why many make the claim that they don’t follow any man or organized group. It means simply that they will not be compliant to those who violate natural justice. Justice means equality in transactions whether they are emotional or material. We call a person with this courage and drive someone with good character.

I ascribe to a personal Christian view of higher authority because it makes more sense when applied to unknowns. Concerning origins, single cells are too complex to have come into existence by a chance static and protein encounter. Something intelligent had to organize the molecules to do those complex things. The idea of a loving God who values human life is also a solid basis for good philosophy toward fellow humans. I hate when it is presented with meanness and dogma. Most organized groups, in order to increase loyalty, require their members to agree on certain dogma and statements. Some leaders are interested in manipulation and enriching themselves by making dependents. I like the flexibility of being my own person concerning religious beliefs since I am the only one in the end who will answer for them. I have a lot of respect and interest in other people’s philosophical beliefs. I won’t change someone’s life stories and ridicule them. Neither will I be that way toward their beliefs. The only time I would challenge someone is if their beliefs violate natural rights and justice. At times I have beliefs that need challenged too and when the challenge comes from from people who are respectful and have good character, I listen closely.

Surreality

Lets take a stroll through a surreal world

It has it’s contradictions like the namesake art. 

The feel of stigma without satisfaction
Not reaching far enough yet going too far
Having it all, but not quite 
Being a person of action who can’t act  
There are a lot of  can’ts, yets and buts here. 
And people apologize for missing each other.  
Weird..



Home

The world is whirring in my head

I can only think of my own bed
The familiar lights on my front porch
Welcomes like a kingly court
A suitcase clunks and hits the floor
The familiar creaking from our door 
My wanderlust is almost bust   
But sleep is sweet after all the fuss