Why would a person want to keep a certain doctor or mechanic? We use the word ‘good’ to describe those we like to interact with. There are a slew of derogatory terms for those who we lose respect for. Notice that money isn’t at the forefront when we are describing good. A doctor who is honest, who takes time to listen and has applied himself to study is the kind we want. We are willing to pay more for his services. Someone who is dishonest, gruff and obtuse would be last on our list. These all have to do with character. And a good person wants to interact with other good people. This makes for a good society.

This is the conservative way of thinking. As a person is good and skillful, wealth will follow since people tend to value the interaction. We despise those who put cost first. If a father forced his daughter to go to the cheaper doctor even though he had a history of abuse, we would despise him. Freedom has to do with choice and good people make the best choices among themselves.

Socialists put cost first. Only doctors who conform to their plan can be used. An indifferent panel makes decisions balancing what they feel is necessary with cost. The assumption is made that common people aren’t good enough to provide for themselves and need a government official to make these decisions for them. Good people despise this practice even in family hierarchy. Since good people make the best choices, having a third party involved causes everyone frustration.

Conservatives believe that the focus should be on character although socialists try to claim it. That is why conservatives appear to be moralists. They see that the best way to remain free is for people to be good and posses good judgement. Quality people require less governing. Socialism is based on the assumption that people are all unfair and bad and they need a hero to come to the rescue. It is  a choice between needing government to step in as heroes or make every individual a hero. I chose the individual.